Bill C-6 has reincarnated as Bill C-36, with pretty much the only change being that there is no more warrantless search and seizure, though Health Canada moved a clause from the Criminal Code so they could get warrants by phone and fax… a process normally reserved for emergency situations with threats to life and limb… over baby cribs?
And I’ve got some lovely oceanfront property in Saskatchewan I’d like to sell them….
This is the same agency that foisted an untested and toxic vaccine on the entire country, and bearing witness to just how toxic are the scads of Canadians who have posted on our H1N1 Vaccine Adverse event reporting page.
While HC told them that the vaccine was safe, understated some risk factors and misled on others (eg. “squalene is a substance found naturally in the body”… true, but it doesn’t get there by injection, which makes the body allergic to its own squalene, causing all sorts of the symptoms listed on that page…), and promoted the vaccine across the country on that basis, now this same agency asks for expanded police powers to “protect Canadians from unsafe products”???
Now, after all the damage has been done (though the “pandemic” remains in effect), we find that there was egregious conflict of interest in the WHO’s pandemic declaration, which was lapped up by that great “protector” of Canadians, Health Canada, and served up on a platter as something where the “slight risks” were overwhelmed by the “benefits” of the vaccine (those being the reaping of humungous profits by vaccine manufacturers).
I received this in my email today. It’s not the first I’ve heard of it, but it really spells it out well. One of our team at CHF sent it to me from a subscription she has… get a load of this:
Hi folks, this is from today’s posting from Health Sciences Institute (HSI) newsletter, to which I have a subscription:
Dear Reader,
“This is one I would definitely like to see called in front of Judge Judy.
The Defendant: Dr. Margaret Chan, director of the World Health Organization (WHO). Dr. Chan recently observed the one-year anniversary of the H1N1 pandemic by announcing that H1N1 is still considered a pandemic.
Of course, this isn’t an old fashioned pandemic where people all over the world witness widespread disease, suffering, and hideous death rates.
No, this is a 21st century pandemic. Call it Pandemic Lite.
So how do you lighten up a pandemic? No problem. About a year ago, WHO officials simply changed the definition of pandemic. No explanation–they just changed it.
Before May 2009, the definition read like this: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
The revised definition removed those last seven words: “with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”
Judge Judy? Your take on this? “Don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining!”
It’s raining.
Once the definition of pandemic was dramatically watered down, H1N1 was ready for prime time. And just a few weeks later, WHO made the announcement: H1N1 was officially a pandemic.
Now, one year later, we have Plaintiff Number One: The Council of Europe.
In a recent report, the CoE accused WHO of vastly overrating the seriousness of the pandemic, adding that WHO’s handling of H1N1 caused a “waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.”
Plaintiff Number Two is the British Medical Journal. A recent BMJ investigation revealed that several experts who advised WHO in planning for an H1N1 pandemic just happened to have financial and professional ties to Roche and GlaxoSmithKline–two drug companies that stood to make huge profits from sales of antiviral drugs in the event of a flu pandemic.
Meanwhile, back in the U.S., experts are predicting that H1N1 is going to be around for awhile.
One microbiologist told HealthDay News that the “new” H1N1 strain will become the “seasonal H1N1 virus.” Call it Seasonal Flu Plus. Just like the garden variety flu, seasonal H1N1 will arrive around Labor Day, linger past St. Patrick’s Day, and will help sell a boatload of seasonal vaccines in between.
So I guess it’s official. Thanks to WHO, H1N1 might not be an actual pandemic but it is a hugely successful worldwide franchise!
You don’t need Judge Judy to tell you we’ve all been scammed. “
What do YOU think? Should Health Canada be allowed ANY police powers, given that they participated up to their well-fed arses in this scheme? Should Bill C-36 be allowed to pass, to let this rogue agency use its influence to damage even more of us?
Or should we stand together and point our collective fingers at this fraud upon the people, to make sure that Health Canada is denied?
Personally, I hope the victims listed here, as well as those to whom the word spreads, are able to file a massive class action suit, to win justice for themselves and their damaged loved ones, over the dead body of Bill C-36!
Posted by Kristie Tait on June 23, 2010 at 12:14 pm
I have little faith in our Government or Health officials…It seems they are more concerned with protecting their credibility than they are with the health and well being of our most precious resources…OUR CHILDREN! I have a child who has suffered 18 of the 27 side effects listed on the HEALTH CANADA website for months. We reported these to doctors who in turn put us out of their office to find a new family doctor & sent us home stating they wish they could do something to help…YA RIGHT! On our way to Edmonton on Monday of this week we had to pull our truck to the side of the road to let our son vomit several times, we then saw a pediatrician who says he wishes he could help and sent us on our way. We had our second interview the CTV news after that appointment & that evening we videotaped our son roll in agony….fill pull up after pull up with diarhhea…sit and fill the toilet with more diarhhea & lay with cold cloths on his stomach. Yet we get no medical attention or help from him….what is it going to take???