Archive for the ‘Autism’ Category

Either you SNORT it, or you SHOOT it?

On Wednesday; AstraZeneca-Canada, was proud to announce that it’s (MedImmune), ‘LIVE‘ – 2009 SWINE FLU VIRUS loaded (Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine live) FluMist Intranasal vaccine, received approval from the GOVERNMENT OF CANADA; Also Traded as HEALTH CANADA.

AstraZeneca, which bought MedImmune, but let the company keep its name. AstraZeneca is now trying to put some big pharma marketing muscle, behind FluMist. It’s kinda strange to see a big ad for a flu vaccine in the middle of summer. During last flu season, FluMist had $55 million in sales…a drop in the bucket for AstraZeneca.

MedImmune, Inc., today (September 19, 2007) announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the expanded use of FluMist® (Influenza Virus Vaccine Live, Intranasal) in children two to five years of age. FluMist is now approved for immunization against influenza A and B viruses in individuals two to 49 years of age.

According the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)–Each year, up to 60 million Americans get the flu, resulting in complications cause more than 200,000 hospitalizations and approximately 36,000 deaths in the U.S. annually.

Hey, what a great plug by the Manitoba Chambers of CommerceFluMist® is the first vaccine in CANADA, that is administered as a gentle mist, sprayed into the nose–With the introduction of FluMist, it’s encouraging to see another vaccine option to help reduce the overall burden of seasonal flu.

Even the CBC has joined forces, it seems, and running a little marketing campaign of their own…they decided to you a rather bias poll…damned if you do style–Will having a spray option make you more likely to get vaccinated? Let us know.

Here’s a snap shot, of what’s really behind this big green curtain:

Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal Manufactured by MedImmune, LLC Intranasal Spray Initial U.S. Approval: 2003

WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS.

5.1 Risks in Children <24 Months of Age

5.2 Asthma/Recurrent Wheezing

5.3 Guillain-Barré Syndrome

5.4 Altered Immunocompetence

5.5 Medical Conditions Predisposing to Influenza Complications

5.6 Management of Acute Allergic Reactions

5.7 Limitations of Vaccine Effectiveness–Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal may not protect all individuals receiving the vaccine.

ADVERSE REACTIONS.

6.2 Postmarketing Experience– The following adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of FluMist. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to vaccine exposure.

Congenital, familial and genetic disorder: Exacerbation of symptoms of mitochondrial encephalomyopathy (Leigh syndrome) – Gastrointestinal disorders: Nausea, vomiting, diarrhea – Immune system disorders: Hypersensitivity reactions (including anaphylactic reaction, facial edema and urticaria) – Nervous system disorders: Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s Palsy – Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders: Epistaxis-Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Rash

DRUG INTERACTIONS.

7.1 Aspirin Therapy

7.2 Antiviral Agents Against Influenza A and/or B–The concurrent use of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist with antiviral agents that are active against influenza A and/or B viruses has not been evaluated.

7.3 Concomitant Inactivated Vaccines–There are no data on the concomitant administration of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal and seasonal trivalent Influenza Virus Vaccines.

7.4 Concomitant Live Vaccines–There are no data on the concomitant administration of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine <b>Live</b>, Intranasal and FluMist.

7.5 Intranasal Products–There are no data regarding co-administration of Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist with other intranasal preparations.

8.1 Pregnancy.

Pregnancy Category C–Animal reproduction studies have not been conducted with Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist. It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman or can affect reproduction capacity.

8.3 Nursing Mothers.

It is not known whether Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist is excreted in human milk. Therefore, as some viruses are excreted in human milk and additionally, because of the possibility of shedding of vaccine virus and the close proximity of a nursing infant and mother, caution should be exercised if Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal or FluMist is administered to nursing mothers.

12 CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

12.1 Mechanism of Action–Immune mechanisms conferring protection against influenza following receipt of FluMist vaccine are not fully understood.

13.1 Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, Impairment of Fertility.

Neither Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal nor FluMist have been evaluated for carcinogenic or mutagenic potential or potential to impair fertility.

14.5 Transmission Study.

FluMist contains live attenuated influenza viruses that must infect and replicate in cells lining the nasopharynx of the recipient to induce immunity. Vaccine viruses capable of infection and replication can be cultured from nasal secretions obtained from vaccine recipients. The relationship of viral replication in a vaccine recipient and transmission of vaccine viruses to other individuals has not been established.

17.2 Vaccination with a Live Virus Vaccine.

Vaccine recipients or their parents/guardians should be informed by the health care provider that Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Monovalent Vaccine Live, Intranasal is an attenuated live virus vaccine and has the potential for transmission to immunocompromised household contacts.

ASK YOUR DOCTOR: Is this medication right for me…would you (doctor), take this FluMist® yourself, and or, happily give it to your children?

Thanks CANADA.

2009 $wine Flu $camdemic…latest news.

Nursing Home Test; ‘Didn’t find’ proof immunization stops virus.
Tom Blackwell, National Post – March 11, 2010

A new Canadian-led study has added to a simmering scientific dispute over flu-shot campaigns, concluding that immunizing nursing-home workers does nothing to cut the number of confirmed influenza cases among the homes’ elderly residents.

Coming at the end of the largest flu-vaccination campaign in Canadian history, the review of previous studies calls for stepped-up research into alternative, lower-tech ways to combat the virus, such as improved hand washing.

In media interviews last year, Dr. Jefferson was quoted as saying he “can’t see any reason” for vaccinating anyone against flu — arguing the shots did nothing to save lives — and that most influenza-vaccine studies are “rubbish.”

Read more: Flu shots for nursing home workers futile: study

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2:CD005187.
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, UCMC, #1707-1632 14th Avenue, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada, T2M 1N7.

Some Health Care Workers (HCWs) remain unvaccinated because they do not perceive risk, doubt vaccine efficacy and are concerned about side effects.

We conclude there is no evidence that vaccinating HCWs prevents influenza in elderly residents in Long Term Care Facilities (LTCFs).

Read more: Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly.

U.S.News & World Report – April 6, 2010
The traditional seasonal flu vaccine may have increased the risk of infection with pandemic H1N1 swine flu, according to the results of four new studies by Canadian researchers.

In one study, the researchers used an ongoing sentinel monitoring system to assess the frequency of prior
vaccination with the seasonal flu vaccine in people diagnosed with H1N1 swine flu in 2009 compared to people without swine flu. The researchers found that seasonal flu vaccination was associated with a 68 percent
increased risk of getting swine flu.

Read more: Did ‘Regular’ Flu Shot Up Risks for H1N1 Flu?

To Go Boldly….Where More Are Now Going.

Accusations abound, in British and French newspapers…the pandemic has been “hyped” by medical researchers to further their own cause, boost research grants and, line the pockets of drug companies.

Just earlier this week, a British newspaper; “The Independent” asked: “Pandemic? What Pandemic?”

France’s Le Parisien newspaper ran this headline: “Swine flu: why the French distrust the vaccine” and noted a gap between the predicted impact of H1N1 and the less dramatic reality.

Polish Health Ministry on swine flu jabs issues A/H1N1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RhZesZe33cw

Commercial bias in medical journals.
Because journal editors have a great deal of control over original scientific articles, commentaries, and editorials, any commercial bias due to their own conflict of interest would affect the content of their journals. Editors might not pursue aggressive conflict of interest policies in their journals, and may fail to enforce existing policies.
BMJ 2006;332:1444-1447 (17 June, 2006), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7555.1444
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/332/7555/1444

Medical Journals Are an Extension of the Marketing Arm of Pharmaceutical Companies.
“Journals have devolved into information laundering operations for the pharmaceutical industry”, wrote Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet, in March 2004.
PLoS Med 2(5): e138. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138- May 17, 2005
http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020138

Influence on the medical profession:
The medical profession has largely abdicated its responsibility to educate medical students and doctors in the use of prescription drugs. Drug companies now support most continuing medical education, medical conferences and meetings of professional associations.

Influence on government:
The pharmaceutical industry has the largest lobby in Washington, DC… there are more pharmaceutical lobbyists there, than members of Congress. And, it gives copiously to political campaigns.
CMAJ • December 7, 2004; 171 (12). doi:10.1503/cmaj.1041594.
http://canadianmedicaljournal.ca/cgi/content/full/171/12/1451

They who joyfully march in rank and file, has already earned my contempt. They have been given a large brain by mistake, since for them, the spinal cord would suffice.
Albert Einstein.

Information compiled and provided by: Christopher-Peter: Maingot; without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

Immunization Graphs: Natural Infectious Disease Declines; Immunization Effectiveness; and Immunization Dangers

DeeSpeak>:

Our friend Pam Killeen is an awesome reporter on health issues, as she proved with her book, The Great Bird Flu Hoax, which she co-wrote with Dr. Joseph Mercola. The file she forwarded here shows indisputable evidence of not only the lack of any protection offered by vaccines, but also of their inherent dangers. Dr. Obomsawin is a noted scientist and his compilation of data here, which is completely sourced and referenced, is compelling evidence against vaccines of any sort.

Prepared by: Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. Senior Advisor -
First Nations Centre National Aboriginal Health Organization, October 2009

Dr. Obomsawin’s report graphically illustrates the following:
In North America, Europe, and the South Pacific , major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance of public immunization efforts for specific diseases as listed. This provides irrefutable evidence that vaccines are not necessary for the effective elimination of a wide range of infectious diseases.
Immunization is not by any means a proven and foolproof measure for protection from various infectious disease conditions. It is often inconsequential epidemiologically, and in some cases it is shown to actually worsen health-care outcomes.
Increases in the number of governmental mandated vaccines correlates with significant increases in death rates for children under the age of five (5); and that the practice is linked to sudden infant death syndrome; various degenerative diseases, including diabetes; and appears to cause general immune system impairment in infants and children.

The graphs provide powerful visual clues as to why vaccines are both ineffective and potentially dangerous:

VIEW THE CHARTS HERE! Share them with your friends!

Source of info: Pam Killeen, health reporter and investigator extraordinaire. See more at www.pamkilleen.com

This video is also worth watching

TERESA FORCADES, doctor in Public Health, reflects on the history, and gives scientific data, of A type flu and lists all the irregularities related to this subject.

She explains the consequences of the declaration of a PANDEMIC, the political consequences from this declaration and makes a proposal to keep calm. She calls for an urgent activation of all legal mechanism and the participation of all citizens in this matter.

http://www.youtube.com/1ALISH

 

 

Dr. Deagle with Dr. Chris Shaw, Tim Alexander and Alexander S. Jones – H1N1 Vaccines 11.04.09

NutriMedical Report – Dr. Deagle with Dr. Chris Shaw, Tim Alexander and Alexander Jones – H1N1 Vaccines 11.04.09 (November 4, 2009)

Archive of an interview from the NutriMedical Report hosted by Dr. Bill Deagle with guests Dr. Chris Shaw (Neuro Scientist at UBC), Tim Alexander (Geo-Political and Military Affairs Analyst) and Alexander S. Jones (NIH Whistleblower) on the H1N1 Flu and the Dangers of Vaccine Adjuvants, based upon peer-reviewed science.

This interview aired on November 4th, 2009 on the Genesis Communications Radio Network (GCN). This is essential information for anyone thinking of getting the vaccine or for those administering it!

Commercial breaks have been edited out.

Related websites:

www.NutriMedical.com

www.GCNlive.com

www.FalseFlagFlu.com

Streaming audio or free mp3 download:

http://www.archive.org/details/NutrimedicalReport-Dr.DeagleWithDr.ChrisShawTimAlexanderAnd…

Related article with GSK ingredients:

They call it Arepanrix …I call it the Pandematrix!

Listen to NutriMedical daily for H1N1 updates. 12 Noon PST on GCN.

NOTE: Dr. Shaw will also speak Sat. Nov. 7th at SPEC Hall, Vancouver. Details Here

DR. CHRIS SHAW,PhD – VACCINE DAMAGE CONFIRMED

Please share this information widely!

Video-How Mercury Destroys Neurons

This is actual footage of neurons being destroyed by mercury.

YouTube:

This video is from the university of Calgary. It shows how mercury kills brain neurons. Using live brain cultures, the mercury is introduced and the video shows how autism occurs.

 

Autism is mercury poisoning!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 65 other followers