The Bitch is Back: Bill C-6 reincarnates as C-36

By Dee Nicholson

Battle-worn health freedom activists waited six months for the shoe to drop, knowing full well that at any moment, their latest nemesis, the Canada Consumer Product Safety Act called C-6, might reappear.

Last month, their impatience was rewarded, as Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq rose to introduce Bill C-36, complete with the same troublesome, rights-stomping provisions as in its momma. And of course, the same really, really nasty language making Canadians “subject to the dictates of foreign authorities”, the words that allow foreign committees (like trade groups) decide how we’re going to run things.

It’ll be their way, or the highway.

Witness the fact that the 106th US Congress voted to change American corporate tax law, not because it wanted to, but because it was ordered to – by the World Trade Organization. Now, if the WTO can yank the chains of the Yankees that easily, do we really think domestic Canadian laws are any less vulnerable?

There have been ten major trade agreements signed by Canada over the past sixteen years, and there are twelve more pending, including the “Free Trade Area of the Americas”. These trade obligations, signed eagerly by our successive governments, have Canada in shackles, and somehow, hardly anybody’s noticing.

Recently, master filmmaker Kevin P. Miller released a documentary showing Canadians how this has happened, in a dynamic retrospective leading to a dubious future: “A Question of Sovereignty” is now online for viewing at, and every red-blooded Canadian needs to see it, and now. It’s 23 minutes of jaw-dropping wake-up call.
Miller describes the film as “patriotic and sentimental” and I have to admit that it brings an uncomfortable lump to the throat as you watch our sovereignty being hijacked. But it also sets your couch on fire.

Miller’s take: “Quietly, over a period of many years, unconstitutional legislation encompassed in Bills C-51, C-6, and the current Bill C-36, have placed not only basic civil liberties and freedoms at risk, but Canada’s national sovereignty as well. The film shares how entangling alliances with groups like the World Trade Organization, the World Health Organization, Codex Alimentarius, the United States and even multinational corporate interests have become so powerful that they literally threaten to make elected officials in Parliament irrelevant.”

I have to thank Kevin for saving me a whole lot of time explaining what’s going on, and let the film speak for itself, because it does. And it’s going to play an important role in how Canadian health freedom fighters will be approaching the nascent battle against Bill C-36, while proving especially valuable in rousing more Canadians from their sleepwalking state.

Take a moment to absorb the very real danger of Canada’s virtual absorption into a global trade network that hovers over this nation right now. Piece by piece, department by department, our self-rule is being eroded by obligations to committees where our vote doesn’t matter. For example, at the World Trade Organization, Canada is one out of nearly 200 nations. One. None of the other members really give a rat’s behind what we want. Worse yet, if we insist on doing our own thing, we face sanctions, in some cases cross-industry trade sanctions of millions per day, or quitting and being viewed as anathema by all the other suckers in the group.

So, no sovereignty, no health freedom. No freedom guaranteed at all. That candle is going out, bit by bit, as the trade groups meet and decide what the whole group will do, and if our laws conflict, too bad, so sad for our laws. And our self-rule.

Meanwhile, there are massive collisions set to happen. All these contracts with all sorts of terms, and what happens when they start to need enforcing? Gridlock. And what do you need when you have gridlock? A traffic cop. Do you see the platform for global government being “necessitated into existence” by the ongoing commitments of our governments, no matter which party was in power? Commitments to trading. To profit. Not to people. To share wealth, meaning spread what we have across the whole slice of bread while they retain the loaf. This is what Harper meant at the G8 when he spoke of “shared prosperity”.

And those were the exact words used by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth at the UN this past week.

Bill C-36 swings the doors to Canada wide open to outside domination by foreign authorities that we will never vote for and who could not care less what we want. These are the same foreign authorities waiting, butter knife in hand, to spread the wealth, which really means to bring the world equal-opportunity poverty.

Without sovereignty, we have nothing, and Bill C-36 takes away a sizeable chunk of it with Codex looming, as well as a big pact with the EU, where the food regulations are just as bad as Codex already. You need to understand the depth and breadth of what Codex will do, and how our government is absolutely committed to going there. (See for full details on Codex, and read constitutional lawyer and health freedom advocate Shawn Buckley’s analysis of Bill C-36 at|

Bear in mind that Health Canada, with C-36, is asking to be granted police and judicial powers, the right to be judge, jury and executioner at will, to impose fines and imprisonment, without recourse to courts or recompense. But we’re supposed to be satisfied by the fact that they promise to call a judge for a warrant? These are the powers that Leona Aglukkaq says are necessary for her agency to “protect Canadians against hazardous consumer products”.

The posts at show what sort of “protection” Canadians got from their government when Health Canada foisted that particular hazardous product on the population. Bear in mind, they did so at the advice of whom? The same WHO that’s been exposed as being in a huge conflict of interest beneficial to Big Pharma for its re-jigging of the very definition of a pandemic in order to declare one, on the advice of people connected to Big Pharma, which made a gazillion dollars feeding the toxic stuff to people around the world, from which many people suffered severe health problems. People like the ones on that page.

This is the same Health Canada that is asking for quasi-judicial powers, to “protect Canadians from hazardous products”.

Remember Leona Aglukkaq, cajoling the Senate with portents of babies dying from faulty crib and playpen designs, if Bill C-6 didn’t pass? She’s trotted that one out already again for its doppelganger, C-36.

Now, unfortunately for Aglukkaq, there are actual dead babies which would today in all likelihood be alive, were it not for Health Canada’s following of foreign “suggestions” in the promotion of the largely-untested H1N1 vaccine to Canadians, with the full expectation of “collateral damage”. And this Minister wants us to believe that this agency could be trusted with police and judicial powers? This Minister wants us to believe that the agency honors the rights of Canadians, after the shameful raid against Dr. Eldon Dahl last year, holding his family at gunpoint for 11 hours because he sold some vitamins in a sting operation by the health police? Dahl had what looked to him like the G20 security force bash in his front door. This protects Canadians, how? In my humble opinion, it doesn’t.

Instead, it endangers the very fabric of our nation.

Thankfully, there is a new army being assembled against Health Canada’s assault on our sovereign right to health freedom, with the establishment of The National Health Federation (Canada). Its parent organization, the NHF (, is the world’s largest and oldest health freedom organization, with branches in nine nations and membership in thirty countries, and is a recognized International Non-Governmental Organization.

The move gives Canada, for the first time, standing as delegates to Codex Alimentarius with the right to speak to the committee, and to Canadians, the ability to speak truth to power. In addition, the organization’s international scope means that we speak with the voices of twenty-nine other nations behind us, sharing the same concerns. That’s more votes than Canada has at the WTO.

I am honored to be one of three Co-Executive Directors of the new NHF Canada, and am gleefully sharpening my teeth. My partners in crime are both heroines in health freedom: Marilyn Nelson, founder of Freedom of Choice in Health Care and veteran of decades of skirmishes with ministers of health; and Candace Hill, nutritionist, passionate educator, and master instigator of stuff happening. With us will be many of the health warriors from Canadians for Health Freedom who barraged the Senate last year with a demand they couldn’t refuse.

Bill C-36, the bitch, is back. We think that calls for neutering.

(View this article in Agora Magazine July 2010)

Would you let this fox run your hen house?

Bill C-6 has reincarnated as Bill C-36, with pretty much the only change being that there is no more warrantless search and seizure, though Health Canada moved a clause from the Criminal Code so they could get warrants by phone and fax… a process normally reserved for emergency situations with threats to life and limb… over baby cribs?

And I’ve got some lovely oceanfront property in Saskatchewan I’d like to sell them….

This is the same agency that foisted an untested and toxic vaccine on the entire country, and bearing witness to just how toxic are the scads of Canadians who have posted on our H1N1 Vaccine Adverse event reporting page.

While HC told them that the vaccine was safe, understated some risk factors and misled on others (eg. “squalene is a substance found naturally in the body”… true, but it doesn’t get there by injection, which makes the body allergic to its own squalene, causing all sorts of the symptoms listed on that page…), and promoted the vaccine across the country on that basis, now this same agency asks for expanded police powers to “protect Canadians from unsafe products”???

Now, after all the damage has been done (though the “pandemic” remains in effect), we find that there was egregious conflict of interest in the WHO’s pandemic declaration, which was lapped up by that great “protector” of Canadians, Health Canada, and served up on a platter as something where the “slight risks” were overwhelmed by the “benefits” of the vaccine (those being the reaping of humungous profits by vaccine manufacturers).

I received this in my email today. It’s not the first I’ve heard of it, but it really spells it out well. One of our team at CHF sent it to me from a subscription she has… get a load of this:

Hi folks, this is from today’s posting from Health Sciences Institute (HSI) newsletter, to which I have a subscription:

Dear Reader,

“This is one I would definitely like to see called in front of Judge Judy.

The Defendant: Dr. Margaret Chan, director of the World Health Organization (WHO). Dr. Chan recently observed the one-year anniversary of the H1N1 pandemic by announcing that H1N1 is still considered a pandemic.

Of course, this isn’t an old fashioned pandemic where people all over the world witness widespread disease, suffering, and hideous death rates.

No, this is a 21st century pandemic. Call it Pandemic Lite.

So how do you lighten up a pandemic? No problem. About a year ago, WHO officials simply changed the definition of pandemic. No explanation–they just changed it.

Before May 2009, the definition read like this: “An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”

The revised definition removed those last seven words: “with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.”

Judge Judy? Your take on this? “Don’t pee on my leg and tell me it’s raining!”

It’s raining.

Once the definition of pandemic was dramatically watered down, H1N1 was ready for prime time. And just a few weeks later, WHO made the announcement: H1N1 was officially a pandemic.

Now, one year later, we have Plaintiff Number One: The Council of Europe.

In a recent report, the CoE accused WHO of vastly overrating the seriousness of the pandemic, adding that WHO’s handling of H1N1 caused a “waste of large sums of public money, and unjustified scares and fears about the health risks faced by the European public.”

Plaintiff Number Two is the British Medical Journal. A recent BMJ investigation revealed that several experts who advised WHO in planning for an H1N1 pandemic just happened to have financial and professional ties to Roche and GlaxoSmithKline–two drug companies that stood to make huge profits from sales of antiviral drugs in the event of a flu pandemic.

Meanwhile, back in the U.S., experts are predicting that H1N1 is going to be around for awhile.

One microbiologist told HealthDay News that the “new” H1N1 strain will become the “seasonal H1N1 virus.” Call it Seasonal Flu Plus. Just like the garden variety flu, seasonal H1N1 will arrive around Labor Day, linger past St. Patrick’s Day, and will help sell a boatload of seasonal vaccines in between.

So I guess it’s official. Thanks to WHO, H1N1 might not be an actual pandemic but it is a hugely successful worldwide franchise!

You don’t need Judge Judy to tell you we’ve all been scammed. ”

What do YOU think? Should Health Canada be allowed ANY police powers, given that they participated up to their well-fed arses in this scheme? Should Bill C-36 be allowed to pass, to let this rogue agency use its influence to damage even more of us?

Or should we stand together and point our collective fingers at this fraud upon the people, to make sure that Health Canada is denied?

Personally, I hope the victims listed here, as well as those to whom the word spreads, are able to file a massive class action suit, to win justice for themselves and their damaged loved ones, over the dead body of Bill C-36!

WHO Appoints H1N1 Cover-Up Committee

(Original HERE)

By James Corbett

Global Research, April 13, 2010
The Corbett Report

Reports that the WHO is appointing an ‘independent’ committee to investigate its own conduct in the H1N1 panic of 2009 has been tempered by the fact that one of the committee’s members, John Mackenzie, was in fact one of the advisors who urged the WHO to declare a pandemic in the first place. He also has ties to vaccine manufacturers, making him part of the very charge being investigated: that the WHO relied on advisers with a financial interest in declaring a pandemic regardless of the facts on the ground.

Evidence continues to mount that the WHO declared a pandemic for the relatively mild H1N1 outbreak last year in order to trigger billions of dollars of automatic vaccine contracts for the benefit of WHO advisers with connections to Big Pharma. In the face of growing opposition and a loss of credibility due to the conflicts of interests among key WHO advisors, WHO Director Margaret Chan called Monday for a “frank, critical, transparent, credible and independent review of our performance” before entering a closed-door meeting with the “independent experts.” No photographers were allowed inside and press was allowed only occasional access to the meeting.

Hopes for a genuinely independent investigation into the scandal were quickly dashed, however, when it was discovered that one of the group’s members, Professor John Mackenzie of Curtin University in Australia, was a member of the very panel that advised the WHO to declare the H1N1 pandemic. In fact, Mackenzie is already on record with his assessment of his own actions: “I think we did everything right,” he told Der Spiegel earlier this year.

Clues to the likely findings and recommendations of the group in Geneva can be derived from other comments Mackenzie made to the German paper: “The system of pandemic levels needs to be revised,” he was quoted as saying. “We need to fine-tune phase 6 so that the severity of the disease is also taken into account.” Analysts are expecting the review to find that the WHO was a victim of fog of war and loose definitions for a pandemic and that no individual will be held responsible for the billions of dollars that have been spent around the world on vaccines that governments are now giving away and may ultimately have to throw out.

Also at issue is why the WHO changed its definition of a pandemic virus just as it was considering whether the emerging swine flu may fit that criteria. A definition available on the website before the panic specifically listed “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” as a criterion for declaring a pandemic. By April, the definition had been changed to specifically allow for “mild” pandemics.

The cover-up committee is being formed ahead of the final report of the ongoing Council of Europe investigation into the scandal. Just last month, the Council released a draft report of its investigation into the affair, delivering a blistering critique of the WHO and its motives for declaring the H1N1 pandemic:

Some members of these advisory bodies evidently have professional links to certain pharmaceutical groups – notably through receiving extensive research grants from the big pharmaceutical groups – so that the neutrality of their advice could be contested. To date, WHO has failed to provide convincing evidence to counter these allegations and the organisation has not published the relevant declarations of interest taking such a reserved position, the Organisation has joined other bodies, such as the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), which likewise, have still not published such documents. –“The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed”

The Council of Europe committee inquiry was spearheaded by Wolfgang Wodarg, the former chair of the Council’s health committee who made waves last year for saying that the WHO faked the pandemic to make money for vaccine manufacturers. The committee is expected to be quite critical of the WHO, leading many to speculate that the WHO-sanctioned group in Geneva is an attempt to get ahead of the damage and issue a limited hangout on the issue.

The independent group is expected to finish its meeting on Wednesday. No word yet if they will address the fact that flu vaccines actually increase the risk of contracting H1N1, or what the effect might be if a vaccine-pushing WHO ignores this information.

The H1N1 panic started last March, with the WHO estimating as many as two billion infections and millions of deaths. Newly released data shows that the 2009 flu season was actually much less deadly than the regular flu season.


If the foregoing isn’t enough to get you steamed, take a peek at our H1N1 Vaccine Adverse Reaction reporting page, and see a tiny piece of the suffering the WHO and our government were willing to cause, to secure profits for vaccine manufacturers.

Then consider that our government actually indemnified vaccine manufacturers against liability for damages from said vaccines.

Then add that the government had people sign waivers, affirming “informed consent” prior to administration of the shot, in a feeble attempt to indemnify itself from said liabilities!

To all those who have reported adverse reactions to the vaccine and have experienced a diminished quality of life since then, I say, call a lawyer now! The waivers were, according to information given me by a professor of law, a top liability expert, “not worth the paper they shouldn’t have been written on.”    I suggest someone go for a class action suit on contingency, recognizing there is a lot of monetary compensation due people who have suffered, and continue to suffer, as you all are.

Our government took liability for vaccine damage? Time they put their money where their mouth is.

We wish you all the best of luck, and please keep reporting here.





2009 $wine Flu $camdemic…latest news.

Nursing Home Test; ‘Didn’t find’ proof immunization stops virus.
Tom Blackwell, National Post – March 11, 2010

A new Canadian-led study has added to a simmering scientific dispute over flu-shot campaigns, concluding that immunizing nursing-home workers does nothing to cut the number of confirmed influenza cases among the homes’ elderly residents.

Coming at the end of the largest flu-vaccination campaign in Canadian history, the review of previous studies calls for stepped-up research into alternative, lower-tech ways to combat the virus, such as improved hand washing.

In media interviews last year, Dr. Jefferson was quoted as saying he “can’t see any reason” for vaccinating anyone against flu — arguing the shots did nothing to save lives — and that most influenza-vaccine studies are “rubbish.”

Read more: Flu shots for nursing home workers futile: study

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Feb 17;2:CD005187.
Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, UCMC, #1707-1632 14th Avenue, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada, T2M 1N7.

Some Health Care Workers (HCWs) remain unvaccinated because they do not perceive risk, doubt vaccine efficacy and are concerned about side effects.

We conclude there is no evidence that vaccinating HCWs prevents influenza in elderly residents in Long Term Care Facilities (LTCFs).

Read more: Influenza vaccination for healthcare workers who work with the elderly.

U.S.News & World Report – April 6, 2010
The traditional seasonal flu vaccine may have increased the risk of infection with pandemic H1N1 swine flu, according to the results of four new studies by Canadian researchers.

In one study, the researchers used an ongoing sentinel monitoring system to assess the frequency of prior
vaccination with the seasonal flu vaccine in people diagnosed with H1N1 swine flu in 2009 compared to people without swine flu. The researchers found that seasonal flu vaccination was associated with a 68 percent
increased risk of getting swine flu.

Read more: Did ‘Regular’ Flu Shot Up Risks for H1N1 Flu?

Canadians for Health Freedom Needs a Little Help from our Friends…. NOW!!

Dear Friends of Health Freedom,




Bill C-6 is going to reincarnate within weeks in Parliament, and Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq has told me that the bill will be brought back in its original form, without the amendments our Senate fought so hard to achieve!

Thanks to prorogation, Harper was able not only to appoint 5 more Conservative Senators to give his party dominance in the Upper House, he was able to re-strike the Standing Committees, which pretty much tells us that the Senate will not be amending this nefarious bill as before. This bill must be fought in Parliament, and in every riding in this country. We must stop our elected members from passing this legislation, or we face the ultimate loss of our national health sovereignty, our ability to make uniquely Canadian law with respect to our health care and our freedom to choose.

Canadians for Health Freedom’s team will go to the mat to stop Bill C-6, not just because the bill has several constitutional violations in its language, but because THIS LAW WOULD MAKE US OBEY THE ORDERS OF FOREIGN AUTHORITIES LIKE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS, the WHO, or any other group to whom we owe “international obligations”.

The new political buzz word is “enlightened sovereignty”:  I would invite you to read my article “A Dim View of Enlightened Sovereignty” posted HERE to shine a little light on what that means!

Bill C-6. under a new number, is a government bill.  That means it is the INTENT of this government to pass this legislation.  And it means it is the INTENT of this Prime Minister to GIVE CANADIAN HEALTH SOVEREIGNTY AWAY IN ORDER TO SERVE OUR “INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS”… which means we have no say in the governance of our own country!!


View the trailer to this shocking new film short
by internationally-acclaimed director Kevin Miller at:

Learn about the real threat to our nation
and to the future Canadian generations,
lurking in Bill C-6 in its new incarnation…



Please send whatever you can afford.. every little bit helps!  We’ve made it easy for you through our friends in the Green Lemonade Club

The Green Lemonade Club at

NB: Please use the following “security question and answer” when completing your transfer, if your bank requires it:

Q.  “Who should govern our health care?”
A. “Canadians”


Send cheque or money order payable to:

The Green Lemonade Club
P.O. Box 132,
Sorrento, BC
V0E 2W0
PLEASE NOTE: The Green Lemonade Club was set up by some of our core CHF group members,  for the sole purpose of providing a means for Canadians for Health Freedom to have a non profit bank account to receive the donations we sorely need to continue this work.  The email will now accept PayPal donations. All monies received are used for the sole purpose of supporting Canadians for Health Freedom.



With sincere thanks to you all, in advance,  for your support,

Dee Nicholson

Don’t Go Near The Water.

By: Christopher-Peter: Maingot

It was determined since 2004, through testing by various water utilities, and thus discovered, that anywhere from 300, to 316 contaminants or pollutants, were found to exist in tap water, which Americans would normally drink.

This information was reported by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), and was based on drinking water quality analysis, of almost 20 million records, obtained from state water officials.

After reading the report on the EWG’s website, I browsed their list of pollutants/contaminants, by clicking on the tab; labeled “Chemical Contaminants.”

Much to my surprise, I could not find such chemicals as Acrylamide, Fluoride, or Polyacrylamide, to name just three others. They were simply not listed, either as pollutants or as contaminants to be often found in tap water…how strange?

The strange thing is: Acrylamide is used to make polyacrylamide materials. Polyacrylamide is used in the treatment of drinking-water and, waste water–It is used to remove particles and other impurities. It is also used to make glues, paper, and cosmetics. Polyacrylamide materials, contain very small amounts of acrylamide.

So what is the problem?

Acrylamide is known to cause cancer in animals. And, certain doses of acrylamide, are toxic to the nervous systems, of both animals and, humans.

Further; it appears to have also been neglected for mention, that several states across the contiguous U.S., are artificially fluoridating the public’s drinking water supplies, and with toxic industrial chemicals…pollutants…example: Fluorosilicic Acids/Hydrofluorosilicic Acids (HFS/HFSA).

This malicious malpractice, or premeditated act, whereby official government agencies, are intentionally contaminating drinking water supplies, and with poisonous (Skull & Bones) industrial waste, is widely being carried out, and in the name of science, no less.

This common practice, is also favorably endorsed and, recommended by; Federal Governments. It is an act that blatantly contaminates, both drinking water and, waste/ground water systems. And, is implemented by all of the Provincial, and most of the Municipality governments across Canada.

These fluoride chemicals are normally of a “commercial grade” and, are constantly being made available…typically from the State of Florida. The use of these chemicals to artificially fluoridate drinking water supplies, is therefore condoned by many elected politicians…making these politicians, and any civil service employees, complicit in this premeditated contamination of the public’s drinking water. Knowingly, these extremely dangerous acids are purchased from industrial chemical suppliers…chemicals which are known to be toxic, corrosive and carcinogenic. How ludicrous can it get; using industrial waste, and purposely adding it to our drinking water, only to further increase the already heavy burdens of contaminants, in our body systems.

The chemicals in question are produced from “smoke-stack-scrubbers”.

They call them “wet scrubbers.”

They are pollution control devices, primarily used by the phosphate, aluminum and chemical industries, to capture fluoride gases produced in the production of commercial fertilizers, and other products.

After being captured in the scrubbers, the fluoride acid (hydrofluorosilicic acid), classified as a hazardous waste, is barreled up and sold (commercial grade) unrefined to communities across North America, and the rest of the World as well.

Communities and or Municipalities, then add the hydrofluorosilicic acid to your drinking water supplies, with the supposed scientific notions, that you will have fewer dental carries, or cavities. It is the primary fluoride chemical used to artificially fluoridate water.

This malpractice has ensued for over 40 years; albeit countless voices in opposition to this mad and malicious, weird science.

Even if you don’t live in a community, where the fluoride is added to the water, you’ll still be getting your dose of it; through cereals, sodas, juices, beer, and any other processed foods and drinks, manufactured with artificially fluoridated water.

These chemicals have long since been determined, by the Workplace Hazardous Materials Information System (WHMIS-Canada) and, Hazardous Materials Identification System (HMIS-U.S.) to be VERY TOXIC, Corrosive liquids. It would otherwise be against the law, to dump these chemicals into our rivers, lakes, and oceans.

How blatantly criminal, should this premeditated act of artificially fluoridating our water be…right up there with manslaughter…especially considering this; these poisons were specifically engineered, and intended to be used for removing toxic substances, from the emitted effluence of industrial smokestacks…only to be then gathered up, again, and dumped into your drinking water.

Perhaps more importantly, or suspiciously; this industrial poison would otherwise bear a negative cost to the Phosphate, Aluminum, and Chemical industries. And, in other words; the profit short falls would be in the hundreds of millions of dollars per year, to otherwise, “safely” dispose of ‘their’ industrial waste.

Business before pleasure…the perfect answer to any bottom line in the corporate world.

Conveniently, it was determined by some so-called master minds, that by dumping these poisonous industrial toxins (pollutants), into the public’s drinking water supplies, would somehow provide them with better teeth, and with no severe adverse affects.

There should be far fewer doubts now, that HFS/HFSA, is a pollutant, and, most definitely a contaminant too.

Health Canada: Fluoride and Human Health – It’s Your Health – July 2008

Most Canadians are exposed to fluorides on a daily basis, through trace amounts that are found in almost all foods and (drinks), through those that are added to drinking water supplies.

Excessive intakes  of fluoride will cause damage to tooth enamel (cigarettes cause cancer…no worries…smoke “LIGHT” cigarettes), resulting in tooth pain and, problems with chewing.

High levels of fluorides, consumed for a very long (VERY LONG? – There’s no tangible or credible results, of specifically how long, very long is…hence…very long) period of time, may lead to skeletal fluorosis.

These levels are much higher than those, to which the average Canadian is exposed daily (purposely having ignored cumulative…build up effects…they…HEALTH CANADA et al, have no current, credible means, of accurately determining the levels, to which Canadians are exposed to fluorides on a daily basis…they should cease and desist, in using such ambiguous phrases…it’s misleading, to say the least).

Skeletal fluorosis is a progressive disease, but not life threatening (my honest assessment of that HEALTH CANADA statement is as such–Who ever wrote that, must obviously have been a lobbyist for the fluoride chemical producing industries, or a total idiot. Perhaps as usual; ‘they’ were confident, that everyone else was–How can anyone not consider bones becoming brittleliving in pain, on a daily basishaving stiff joints, every dayhaving difficulty in moving, due to deformed bones, and, being at greater risk of having bone fractures…not to be a threat to normal life?).

Despite the obvious and controversial implications, i.e. risks to humans, animals, ecological and environmental health…HEALTH CANADA continues to promote, and endorse this commercial, industrial grade “DRUG” (FLUORIDE), as being one of the most successful preventive health measures in the history of health (dental) care .

What is behind this degree of HEALTH that CANADA provides?

Information provided without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.

Be “SAAFE” – Speak Against Artificially Fluoridated Environments – Society Against Artificially Fluoridated Environments

Don’t go near the water…
Don’t you think it’s sad,
What’s happened to the water?
Our water’s goin’ bad.

Oceans, rivers, lakes and streams
Have all been touched by man.
The poison floatin’ out to sea
Now threatens life on land.

Don’t go near the water…
Ain’t it sad,
What’s happened to the water?
It’s going bad.

Don’t go near the water;
Don’t go near the water…

Toothpaste and soap will make our oceans a bubble bath,
So let’s avoid an ecological aftermath.
Beginning with me,
Beginning with you…

Don’t go near the water
To do it any wrong;
To be cool with the water
Is the message of this song.

Let’s all help the water—
Right away!
Do what we can and ought to—
Let’s start today.

Don’t Go Near The Water – Lyrics by Mike Love and Al Jardine for The Beach Boys.

(Brackets) bolding and underlining mine.

HEALTH CANADA’S recipe for Rx food preparations.

By: Christopher-Peter: Maingot

HEALTH CANADA…also traded as the GOVERNMENT of CANADA, has put forth somewhat of another novel idea; but as in the past however, they continuing to embrace the tendency, to simply follow in the footsteps of others.

Perhaps their mentalities, and or mandates, are orchestrated, in an effort to keep stride with the new world order, or the global governance AGENDA…fulfilling a commitment…one which is perhaps owed to the various administrations, agencies, organizations, or the councils, and their foreign relations.

HEALTH CANADA’S “bureau of chemical safety” has wasted no time, it seems, in completing what has been deemed a “detailed safety assessment.” This time, they’re completely satisfied with all risks associated with this particular idea; mass dosing of the public with a controversial enzyme…they are proceeding with their plans to add this substance/drug into your food…giving you the opportunity to comment on their idea, was merely meant to remove your remedy…caveat emptor.

The enzyme in question is otherwise known as Asparaginase and, it is the active or main ingredient in a cancer therapy drug, used in the treatment of lymphocytic leukemia.

Asparaginase is a drug…having distinct associations with serious safety issues, and rightly so…it’s classified as a High Alert Medication.

The very first bit of information on the drug’s information sheet, reads as follows; WARNINGS: It is recommended that asparaginase be administered to patients only in a hospital setting, under the supervision of a physician who is qualified by training and, experienced to administer cancer chemotherapeutic agents, because of the possibility of severe reactions, including anaphylaxis and sudden death.

Albeit the serious contraindications associated with this drug, and given the particular sources of some of these red flags, viz The Institute for Safe Medication Practices; HEALTH CANADA’S scientists have already concluded that there are no health or safety concerns associated with the use of asparaginase. So therefore, “the Department” has already gone ahead and initiated the regulatory process to amend Division 16 of the Food and Drug Regulations.

What seems the norm, or a mundane practice every Monday morning now, is “fast- tracking.”

With this particular scenario, it was initiated after HEALTH CANADA was “petitioned,” and from a source that may yet, still be unknown to the public.

The “petitioner,” has in essence, requested that amendments be made to the CANADA Food and Drug Regulations Act, so that the drug, Asparaginase, can be added to the already mega list. And, this will be accomplished under a different guise, where it’s planned to be marketed as a food additive…still being a drug, never the less.

This cancer therapy drug, which HEALTH CANADA already has plans to sanction, is then to be sprinkled on your French fries and chips, and included in other food products as well.

Hauntingly, this too (asparaginase) may be manufactured and, supplied by the very same Pharmaceutical Corporation, that purportedly gave us AIDS and SV40…the latter being a monkey virus, long known to have contaminated vaccines and, which is the actual cause of cancers.

One thing’s for sure: this government-sponsored act of drugging what you eat, will surely provide for a new definition of the term Junk food.

Incidentally, there have already been the influences of a CORPORATE type. They have provided for the inclusion into the recipe, of this drug, now added to many food products currently manufactured, in several G/Countries. And, the plan is to include the use of this drug in the manufacturing of food products in Canada too.

Some of the common food products, to include the prescription recipes, will include wheat dough-based products; such as bread, crackers and cookies. Also, cut potato products; such as French fries, sliced potato products and, fabricated potato chips…the typical diet of many low and middle-income classes of earthlings.

CANADA makes note: Asparaginase is already in use in food manufacturing, in other countries, such as: the U.S.A., Australia, New Zealand, and Denmark (the usual suspects). And, it has already been given favourable evaluations by the Joint United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) along with the World Health Organization–Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA).

Food & Consumer Products of Canada (FCPC): this national industry (GROUP) association in Canada represents the food and consumer products industry. The group’s senior vice-president, Derek Nighbor, has already encouraged the GOVERNMENT of CANADA to move swiftly, as other modern countries in the world have.

This entire situation is merely another example of “New Drugs – Fast Tracked” through the otherwise bureaucratic system…usually perceived as involving extensive, and or in-depth analysis, which includes rigorously monitored clinical testing.

For many, this very scenario is already too familiar, and one that owes its dubious notoriety to commendable reporting…after all, industry journals have already had their say. So perhaps there really does exist, this so-called conspiratorial relationship between CORPORATIONS and GOVERNMENTS otherwise referred to as Corporatocracy.

And, it seems that CANADA is ready once again, to sign us away on their dotted lines; especially under the influence of the recommenders and evaluators…in other words…the deal has already been given the good house keeping, seal of approval.

These accusations, which abound, are quite relative to the financial support, and their obvious influences on government.

Incentives to approve new drugs are usually offered by the pharmaceutical industry. And, their motivating factors are driven by their copious gift giving…geared especially toward political campaign contributions. There are more pharmaceutical lobbyists (largest) in Washington, DC, than there are members of Congress.

So…why do the powers that be wish to add asparaginase into many of our food products?

Well, its due to some research, suggesting that asparaginase will reduce acrylamide production…acrylamide is thought to be a by-product of cooking at high temperatures, and for long periods of time.

Acrylamide is known to cause cancer in animals and, perhaps of equal or more significance: certain doses of chemical contaminants are toxic to the nervous system, of both animals and, humans.

Acrylamide is a chemical, that’s used to make other chemicals, such as polyacrylamide. Polyacrylamide is typically used in the treatment of drinking water, and wastewater, where it is used to remove particles and other impurities.

For many of us, we have grown virtually accustomed to accessing information at the speed of light. And, this may or may not be such a good thing, especially where self-induced stress might be a factor.

While doing research on this subject, I came across this interesting report, issued by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), and titled: Over 300 Pollutants in U.S. Tap Water.

Now, this is where the concerns about stress comes into play…clicking on the tab labeled “Chemical Contaminants” on the EWG website, via the above link, simply served to stress me out…why…because I could not find Acrylamide, nor Polyacrylamide. It was neither listed as a pollutant, or a contaminant in the tap water studied…how strange?

Getting back to the deal of spiking your junk with pharmaceutical grade drugs, and the downer it will prove to be.

CONTRAINDICATIONS: in some instances, fatality has been reported following asparaginase administration. Asparaginase is also contraindicated in patients who have had previous anaphylactic reactions to it.

WARNINGS: Allergic reactions to asparaginase are frequent…they are not completely predictable on the basis of the intradermal skin test (exercise caution while eating your French fries and chips, especially when using your fingers). Anaphylaxis and death have occurred even in a hospital setting, and with experienced observers. In view of the unpredictability of the adverse reactions to asparaginase, it is recommended that this product be used in a hospital setting…is this why we often see fast food franchises located within hospitals now?

Asparaginase has an adverse effect on liver function in the majority of patients. Therapy with asparaginase may increase pre-existing liver impairment, caused by prior therapy or the underlying disease. Because of this, there is a possibility that asparaginase may increase the toxicity of other medications.

PRECAUTIONS: Asparaginase has been reported to have immunosuppressive activity in animal experiments. Asparaginase toxicity is reported to be greater in adults than in pediatrics. There are no adequate studies on the effects of asparaginase on fertility.

Tell your doctor, pharmacist, and fast food manager about any prescription and non-prescription medications you are taking, especially aspirin, methotrexate (Rheumatrex, MTX), and vitamins…vitamins?

Tell your doctor, pharmacist, and fast food manager if you have, or ever had liver, kidney, or pancreatic diseases.

You should know that asparaginase may interfere with the normal menstrual cycle in women, and may stop sperm production in men.

Women, who are pregnant or breast-feeding, should tell their doctors, and fast food managers, before they begin taking this drug. Asparaginase may harm the fetus.

Do not have any vaccinations (e.g., Seasonal or, A/H1N1-Swine Flu shots) without talking to your doctor, and or fast food manager.

Information provided without prejudice, malice aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers